@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ module CfgImpl {
431431 predicate preOrderExpr ( Ast:: Expr e ) {
432432 // The call of a `defer` statement is not invoked at the statement
433433 // itself; its callee expression and arguments are evaluated in place,
434- // but the call is only invoked later, at function exit (modelled by the
434+ // but the call is only invoked later, at function exit (modeled by the
435435 // `defer-invoke` node and `additionalSuccessor`). Marking it as
436436 // pre-order means no in-order "invocation" node (and hence no inline
437437 // exceptional-exit edge) is created at the `defer` statement.
@@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ module CfgImpl {
749749 // A `break` in a communication clause body terminates the enclosing
750750 // `select` statement, continuing after it. This mirrors the shared
751751 // library's handling of `break` in a `switch` case body, but `select` is
752- // modelled language-specifically (it is not a `Switch`), so the break
752+ // modeled language-specifically (it is not a `Switch`), so the break
753753 // must be caught here. The break completion bubbles up the AST until it
754754 // reaches a top-level statement of the comm clause body, at which point
755755 // flow resumes after the `select`. An unlabeled `break` targets the
@@ -1283,7 +1283,7 @@ module CfgImpl {
12831283 * Slice expression: base -> implicit-deref? -> low? -> high? -> max? -> In(sliceExpr).
12841284 *
12851285 * Missing (implicit) bounds have no control-flow node of their own; the
1286- * implicit lower bound of `0` is modelled as a constant on the
1286+ * implicit lower bound of `0` is modeled as a constant on the
12871287 * `SliceInstruction` rather than as a separate node.
12881288 */
12891289 private predicate sliceExprStep ( PreControlFlowNode n1 , PreControlFlowNode n2 ) {
@@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@ module CfgImpl {
13871387 )
13881388 or
13891389 // Positional array/slice elements have an implicit index that is
1390- // modelled on the `lit-init` instruction itself (see
1390+ // modeled on the `lit-init` instruction itself (see
13911391 // `IR::InitLiteralElementInstruction`) rather than as a separate node.
13921392 exists ( int i |
13931393 n1 .isAfter ( lit .getElement ( i ) ) and
0 commit comments