Description
The 7.x API has no counterpart to ts.resolveModuleName, and no other way to ask "what does this specifier resolve to from this file?". The compiler does the resolution internally when it builds a program, but a consumer cannot invoke it on its own.
That matters for tools that resolve outside of, or ahead of, a program:
- Finding a package's declaration entry from its directory, so that
exports conditions, typesVersions and the types/typings fallbacks all apply — the thing ts.resolveModuleName(manifest.name, path.join(dir, "__entry__.ts"), options, host) answered in one call.
- Reporting where an import would resolve to, without materialising a program for it.
- Deciding which files to load before opening a project.
The roadmap in #63875 covers createProgram, createSourceFile, transpileModule and parseCommandLine under "top-level utility APIs", but resolution is not among them. microsoft/typescript-go#455 named "resolution behavior" as one of the critical use cases the API was meant to serve, so I may simply have missed where this is tracked — if there is an existing issue, this can be closed as a duplicate.
Why a workaround isn't sufficient
Reimplementing it means reimplementing Node's exports algorithm. I have done so for the narrow case of a package resolving its own name, and it is about 40 lines that handle condition maps, arrays and the ./subpath split:
function selectExportTarget(target: unknown, conditions: ReadonlySet<string>): string | undefined {
if (typeof target === "string") return target;
if (Array.isArray(target)) {
for (const alternative of target) {
const selected = selectExportTarget(alternative, conditions);
if (selected) return selected;
}
return undefined;
}
if (target && typeof target === "object") {
for (const [condition, value] of Object.entries(target)) {
if (conditions.has(condition)) {
const selected = selectExportTarget(value, conditions);
if (selected) return selected;
}
}
}
return undefined;
}
That covers the fixtures I have and nothing more. It does not handle typesVersions, symlink realpath resolution (pnpm layouts), extension substitution, or paths. Every consumer that needs resolution will write a different subset, each wrong in a different way, and none will agree with the compiler that ultimately type-checks the code.
Suggested shape
Something close to the 6.x signature, answering from the same implementation the compiler uses:
resolveModuleName(
moduleName: string,
containingFile: string,
compilerOptions: CompilerOptions,
): { resolvedFileName: string; isExternalLibraryImport: boolean; extension: string } | undefined
A snapshot-scoped variant (project.resolveModuleName(...)) would work equally well for my case and might fit the existing model better, since options and the file system are already established there.
Use case
Porting OpenRewrite's JavaScript/TypeScript parser from the 6.x API. One component enumerates the public types a package exports, and locates each package's declaration entry by resolving the package's own name from inside its directory. On 6.x that is a single resolveModuleName call; on 7.x it is the hand-rolled subset above, which loses exports maps that name declarations only under a condition the subset does not model.
Verified against 7.0.2 and typescript@next (7.1.0-dev.20260827.1).
Description
The 7.x API has no counterpart to
ts.resolveModuleName, and no other way to ask "what does this specifier resolve to from this file?". The compiler does the resolution internally when it builds a program, but a consumer cannot invoke it on its own.That matters for tools that resolve outside of, or ahead of, a program:
exportsconditions,typesVersionsand thetypes/typingsfallbacks all apply — the thingts.resolveModuleName(manifest.name, path.join(dir, "__entry__.ts"), options, host)answered in one call.The roadmap in #63875 covers
createProgram,createSourceFile,transpileModuleandparseCommandLineunder "top-level utility APIs", but resolution is not among them. microsoft/typescript-go#455 named "resolution behavior" as one of the critical use cases the API was meant to serve, so I may simply have missed where this is tracked — if there is an existing issue, this can be closed as a duplicate.Why a workaround isn't sufficient
Reimplementing it means reimplementing Node's
exportsalgorithm. I have done so for the narrow case of a package resolving its own name, and it is about 40 lines that handle condition maps, arrays and the./subpath split:That covers the fixtures I have and nothing more. It does not handle
typesVersions, symlink realpath resolution (pnpm layouts), extension substitution, orpaths. Every consumer that needs resolution will write a different subset, each wrong in a different way, and none will agree with the compiler that ultimately type-checks the code.Suggested shape
Something close to the 6.x signature, answering from the same implementation the compiler uses:
A snapshot-scoped variant (
project.resolveModuleName(...)) would work equally well for my case and might fit the existing model better, since options and the file system are already established there.Use case
Porting OpenRewrite's JavaScript/TypeScript parser from the 6.x API. One component enumerates the public types a package exports, and locates each package's declaration entry by resolving the package's own name from inside its directory. On 6.x that is a single
resolveModuleNamecall; on 7.x it is the hand-rolled subset above, which losesexportsmaps that name declarations only under a condition the subset does not model.Verified against
7.0.2andtypescript@next(7.1.0-dev.20260827.1).