docs: align test and coverage claims

[WilliamK112]

Summary

• replace the remaining stale 800+ tests / 95%+ coverage claims in the FAQ and feature overview
• align both pages with the existing 1,200+ tests / 93% CI-enforced coverage gate wording used by the documentation index and repository configuration

Why

The two stale pages contradicted both the documentation index and the actual --cov-fail-under=93 test configuration, which made the project's public quality claims inconsistent.

Validation

• repository-wide Markdown audit confirms there are no remaining 800+ tests or 95%+ coverage claims
• consistency assertion confirms the 1,200+ tests and 93% coverage gate wording is present across the public docs
• mkdocs build --strict
• git diff --check

Closes #159

AI-assisted: Codex was used to help audit and update the documentation; the final diff and strict documentation build were reviewed locally.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated production-readiness FAQ statistics to reflect 1,200+ tests and a 93% CI-enforced coverage gate.
  • Updated the feature overview to mention 1,200+ tests, 93% coverage, and mypy-clean status.
  • Clarified that Python version support and public-dataset validation remain unchanged.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

No new commits to review since the last review.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 9464fddc-3498-46ee-b655-38f6ba247c8a

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 50ba895b-454b-4570-b2ca-c358d0b340fe

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f4cf5d8 and ab59f1d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• docs/faq.md
• docs/feature-overview.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The documentation now states that freshdata has 1,200+ tests and a 93% CI-enforced coverage gate. Other documented support and validation details remain unchanged.

Changes

Documentation metrics

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Align documented quality metrics docs/faq.md, docs/feature-overview.md	Updated test-count and coverage claims to 1,200+ tests and a 93% CI-enforced coverage gate.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• FreshCode-Org/freshdata#143: Updates related documentation claims about test coverage and CI quality metrics.

Suggested reviewers: johnnywilson-portfolio, johnnywilson16

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The updates address issue #159 by replacing stale claims and documenting validation for consistent 93% coverage and 1,200+ tests claims.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	The changes are limited to the FAQ and feature overview, both of which are within issue #159 scope.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the documentation change to align test and coverage claims.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description explains the changes, rationale, issue, and validation steps, but it omits the template's Type of Change and Checklist sections.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[WilliamK112]

@coderabbitai review

[strix-security]

Strix is installed on this repository, but we couldn't run this PR security review because this workspace's trial has ended. Add a card to resume code reviews here.

So far, Strix has reviewed 36 pull requests, surfaced 3 security issues (1 critical/high) and blocked 1 risky merge across this workspace.

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Action not completed

Already reviewed.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[kevincostner17]

Verdict: Valid — approve

Checked against #159.

Acceptance criteria

Criterion	Status
Single coverage figure (93%) across docs/README	Pass after this PR
No contradictory test-count claims	Pass — remaining 800+ / 95%+ were only in docs/faq.md and docs/feature-overview.md
Aligns with --cov-fail-under=93	Pass
mkdocs build --strict	Pass (author + CI)

Verification

I grepped docs/ and README.md on main:

• Already correct: docs/index.md (“1,200+ tests, 93% coverage gate”), README.md (93% gate), contributing docs, trust-claims.md
• Stale (this PR): docs/faq.md, docs/feature-overview.md

After the change, wording matches the enforced gate and the index. No leftover 800+ / 95%+ claims.

Good to merge.

[kevincostner17]

Thanks @WilliamK112 — this was a small but important honesty fix.

Aligning FAQ and the feature overview with the actual 93% CI gate (and dropping the stale 800+/95% figures) keeps the public claims consistent. Appreciate you catching and cleaning that up.