Changelog: August 5, 2026 - #56
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 94d7dade20
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| <Update label="August 5, 2026" tags={["Billing"]}> | ||
| ## Two separate credit balances, one for each scan type | ||
|
|
||
| **Separate Automation and Whitebox credits**: Your credits are now split into two independent accounts - Automation credits for Code Review and one for Whitebox scans. Each has its own balance, billing period usage, and top-up settings, so spending on one type never affects the other. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the Code Review billing description
For users reading the changelog to understand the new balances, this sentence says Automation credits are for Code Review, but the billing docs distinguish Code Review as seat/subscription billed while Automation credits are consumed by automation/remediation runs. Please phrase this as Automation/remediation credits versus Whitebox Scan credits; otherwise the changelog announces the wrong billing model and can make teams think PR reviews spend from the Automation balance.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Documentation TODOs
These shipped features still need docs. The changelog links only to pages that already exist - add or update these, then link them: