Skip to content

Changelog: August 5, 2026 - #56

Open
maekuss wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
changelog/9bb43006
Open

Changelog: August 5, 2026#56
maekuss wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
changelog/9bb43006

Conversation

@maekuss

@maekuss maekuss commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • Date: August 5, 2026
  • Commit: 9bb43006

Documentation TODOs

These shipped features still need docs. The changelog links only to pages that already exist - add or update these, then link them:

  • Separate Automation and Whitebox credits: Document the two-account credits model on the billing page - explain the difference between Automation credits (Code Review) and Whitebox Scan Credits, how each balance is displayed, how top-up settings work independently per account, and how to view credit history for each.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 94d7dade20

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread changelog.mdx
<Update label="August 5, 2026" tags={["Billing"]}>
## Two separate credit balances, one for each scan type

**Separate Automation and Whitebox credits**: Your credits are now split into two independent accounts - Automation credits for Code Review and one for Whitebox scans. Each has its own balance, billing period usage, and top-up settings, so spending on one type never affects the other.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Correct the Code Review billing description

For users reading the changelog to understand the new balances, this sentence says Automation credits are for Code Review, but the billing docs distinguish Code Review as seat/subscription billed while Automation credits are consumed by automation/remediation runs. Please phrase this as Automation/remediation credits versus Whitebox Scan credits; otherwise the changelog announces the wrong billing model and can make teams think PR reviews spend from the Automation balance.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant