test: close test framework parity gaps - #47
Merged
Conversation
Pluze
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 24, 2026 06:39
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Goal and scope
User-visible behavior
Validation
docs/development/maintain-and-release/testing.md.Commands and results:
Manual / native behavior not verified:
Documentation and boundaries
docs/history/records/**/*.mdrecord were updated where required.+labkitchanges, if any, are domain-neutral and app-facing.Boundary decision:
DefinitionInspectormethod was removed; the conformance spec uses the existing private inspection boundary.Delivery state
CI / review links:
41cca68b: https://github.com/Pluze/LabKit-MATLAB-Workbench/actions/runs/30072490315 (all 9 jobs passed).Data hygiene
Unverified behavior