Add structural engineering unit relations#1674
Merged
angularsen merged 2 commits intoJul 20, 2026
Merged
Conversation
angularsen
approved these changes
Jul 20, 2026
angularsen
left a comment
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks good to me. The added relations are dimensionally consistent, useful for structural engineering, and fit the existing relation-generation pattern.
From my side this is ready to merge.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Some generated unit relations that are useful in structural engineering were missing. Adding them makes it possible to express common derived relationships directly with UnitsNet quantities instead of manually converting through raw numeric values.
Changes
Validation
master, reran code generation with no extra diff, and ran the affected relation test classes on net9 successfully.