HIVE-29797: Use Iceberg 1.11.0 public variantShreddingFunc instead of reflection - #6669
Open
kokila-19 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
HIVE-29797: Use Iceberg 1.11.0 public variantShreddingFunc instead of reflection#6669kokila-19 wants to merge 1 commit into
kokila-19 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
kokila-19
changed the title
kokila-19
changed the title
kokila-19
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 4, 2026 06:16
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace reflection-based variant shredding setup in HiveFileWriterFactory with Iceberg’s public API.
Why are the changes needed?
After Iceberg upgrade to 1.11.0 where Parquet.DataWriteBuilder.variantShreddingFunc() is public, the reflection workaround is no longer necessary.
Iceberg PR: apache/iceberg#14153
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
CI