Add research note: ToolHive — Secure Runtime and Gateway for MCP Servers - #38
Open
rkoster wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Add research note: ToolHive — Secure Runtime and Gateway for MCP Servers#38rkoster wants to merge 1 commit into
rkoster wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
rkoster
requested review from
beyhan,
itsouvalas and
wayneeseguin
as code owners
August 17, 2026 14:10
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Research note on Stacklok's flagship project, ToolHive — a platform for running MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers with per-server container isolation and a gateway that centralizes authentication, authorization, and observability.
Covers: container/permission-profile isolation, the frontend/backend auth split, Cedar-based authorization, the Kubernetes Operator, the Registry Server (provenance/signing), and current MCP ecosystem/transport context. Raises CF-relevance questions around UAA/Cedar policy mapping, Diego vs. Kubernetes operator deployment models, and overlap with CF's service-binding model.
Checklist
research/TEMPLATE.mdand filled in required frontmatter (title, author, date, tags, status, sources)devbox run -- python .github/scripts/validate_notes.py→OK: 8 research note(s) and 4 idea(s) valid.