Replace all testcase instances of 'module' with 'namespace'

[Ryan Cavanaugh (RyanCavanaugh)]

Setting this up so that the incoming "deprecate module foo {" PR has a more reasonable diff

If anyone knows which tests are intentionally doing this let me know, otherwise we can just add a handful more in the implementation PR

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This pull request replaces all instances of the module keyword with namespace in TypeScript test case baseline files. This change is preparatory work for a future PR that will deprecate the module foo { syntax in favor of the namespace keyword, which is the modern and preferred way to declare internal modules in TypeScript.

Key Changes:

• Systematic replacement of module declarations with namespace declarations across test baseline files
• Updated line numbers and symbol references in baseline files to reflect the keyword length change (3 additional characters)
• No functional changes to TypeScript behavior, only syntax modernization in test files

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 300 out of 5766 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
Multiple .types files	Updated type checking baselines with namespace replacing module declarations
Multiple .symbols files	Updated symbol resolution baselines with adjusted line numbers due to keyword change
Multiple .js files	Updated JavaScript compilation output baselines showing namespace syntax
Multiple .errors.txt files	Updated error message baselines with corrected line references

[Ryan Cavanaugh (RyanCavanaugh)]

Output of git show on this commit https://gist.github.com/RyanCavanaugh/6c12002ad7615a9e771177a042e7ec20

[Daniel Rosenwasser (DanielRosenwasser)]

I wonder if they still use module?

[Jake Bailey (jakebailey)]

Searching github shows no results other than this test.

[Jake Bailey (jakebailey)]

Do we have unit tests which hit this?

[Ryan Cavanaugh (RyanCavanaugh)]

We have a few, incrementalParser.ts and preProcessFile.ts for example

[Jake Bailey (jakebailey)]

Right, I didn't see them in the gist, so wasn't sure if they were intentionally missing or just out of scope for this already mega-big-large PR. Probably best to do it elsewhere.