Skip to content

Update stellar-archivist to the new Rust version - #2776

Merged
anupsdf merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/stellar-archivist-rs
Aug 22, 2026
Merged

Update stellar-archivist to the new Rust version#2776
anupsdf merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/stellar-archivist-rs

Conversation

@jayz22

@jayz22 jayz22 commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

to be merged after stellar/rs-stellar-archivist#32

@stellar-jenkins-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jayz22
jayz22 marked this pull request as ready for review August 21, 2026 16:13
@jayz22
jayz22 requested review from anupsdf and a balanced review from Copilot August 21, 2026 16:13

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates validator documentation from the legacy Go archivist to the Rust implementation.

Changes:

  • Documents Rust CLI installation and archive operations.
  • Adds scan, repair, mirror, and JSON report examples.
  • Updates related links and package listings.

Recommendation: NEEDS-CHANGES — correct the CLI names/flags and the backfill workflow.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
running-node.mdx Links to mirror guidance.
publishing-history-archives.mdx Replaces legacy archivist instructions.
prerequisites.mdx Links backfill guidance.
installation.mdx Lists Rust and deprecated Go packages.
node-operator-tools.mdx Adds the Rust archivist.

💡 Configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread docs/validators/admin-guide/publishing-history-archives.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/validators/admin-guide/publishing-history-archives.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/validators/admin-guide/publishing-history-archives.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/validators/admin-guide/publishing-history-archives.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/tools/developer-tools/node-operator-tools.mdx Outdated
@jayz22
jayz22 force-pushed the docs/stellar-archivist-rs branch from 60ec381 to 19c9efa Compare August 21, 2026 17:42
@stellar-jenkins-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown

1 similar comment
@stellar-jenkins-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@SirTyson SirTyson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we might want to flip the framing in the repair section. IMO archives are a hot mess right now, and we want to encourage the simplest thing possible. I think we should lead with the non-plan variant (as it's a one shot command), instead of leaving the non-plan variant as a footnote.

@anupsdf anupsdf left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Posted a few questions.

Comment thread docs/validators/admin-guide/installation.mdx
Comment thread docs/validators/admin-guide/publishing-history-archives.mdx Outdated
Comment thread docs/validators/admin-guide/publishing-history-archives.mdx

@anupsdf anupsdf left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would be nice to simplify the commands in a followup PR to make it easier for operators.

@jayz22

jayz22 commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think we might want to flip the framing in the repair section. IMO archives are a hot mess right now, and we want to encourage the simplest thing possible. I think we should lead with the non-plan variant (as it's a one shot command), instead of leaving the non-plan variant as a footnote.

Yeah, I think that makes sense. I've restructured the repair section to lead with the non-plan variant.

Would be nice to simplify the commands in a followup PR to make it easier for operators.

This should also be better now with the above change.

@stellar-jenkins-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@SirTyson SirTyson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks!

@anupsdf
anupsdf merged commit 6fc5ae4 into main Aug 22, 2026
9 checks passed
@anupsdf
anupsdf deleted the docs/stellar-archivist-rs branch August 22, 2026 02:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants