OIC semantic code-start gate closure candidate - #37
Draft
veraxis-protocol wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope
Owner-authorized non-semantic closure of OD-001 through OD-004 from current main
fc96d6f590a6f8ed12ecbb256f33f6de16d0c619.PR #35 at
8fc72aba7c7de80e64de83a8f9f65184b002b9acremains the historical audit/readiness evidence basis. This is a fresh closure branch; it does not implement semantics.Owner decisions represented
ztl-v0.1/0.1.0, signed tagveraxis-ztl-input-v0.2-signed, commit56e1ff0510c62b04dbd85bbe08b7a6deacbf276b, fixture-index SHA-256ffadd65352d69ffcf55787c6dc26339e51eaed76b4c2ae789f7c813625247145. No ZTL runtime import, call, or semantic change.ActionProposal → OIC exact proposal → RuntimeDecision → evidence handed downstream toward VEIPboundary. OIC has no VEIP lifecycle authority; VEIP does not reinterpret ZTL; absent integration fails closed; no adapter/import/execution is authorized.Synthetic source identities
SYN-NS-GOV-1:b882459931ddf06fb647e6885c1ced368b4a5f45b6441df618484a30473a2a24SYN-NS-PROC-1:cfb578274460cc17492f4b25a4db6893ce87a527e1207fe6a52b6384125ec073SYN-NS-AMEND-2:8e197bc9e01554853163dfb5f84ad807893f678b26673737c8a72ddf0c8daf476e89ad25847944ca2bd72bcbf02ec3d2942a234d373b6c10db44307e0fbdf2c3Fail-closed evidence
The new stdlib-only verifier and contract tests refuse all 15 required conditions: synthetic-as-real authority, missing synthetic classification, byte mutation, provenance mismatch, fabricated government metadata, wrong ZTL commit/tag/index, stale currentness, Tier-1 escalation, executable VEIP integration, OIC lifecycle authority, VEIP reinterpretation of ZTL, premature semantic implementation, and global-manifest escalation.
Global
verify-manifest --allremains truthfully INCOMPLETE / exit 3. Scoped prerequisite readiness does not launder global completeness.Local producer verification
git diff --check: cleanmake verify PYTHON=.venv/bin/python: schema 9/9, bootstrap 52/52, scoped verifier PASS, global manifest INCOMPLETE / exit 3 as expectedruff check .: PASSruff format --check .: PASS (47 files)python -m mypy src tests: PASS (35 source files)python -m pip check: PASSpython -m pip_audit --skip-editable: no known vulnerabilitiespytestandmake falsify: authoring host Python 3.12 process exited by signal 11; no assertion result was produced. GitHub-hosted exact-PR-composition CI is required and is the decisive suite evidence.Claim ceiling
No semantic compiler correctness, source-interpretation correctness, legal correctness, benchmark performance, runtime authority, VEIP lifecycle, production-readiness, or expanded product claim is made.
SEMANTIC CODE-START GATE:
READY FOR SEPARATE EXACT-HEAD REVIEW
NOT OPEN
SEMANTIC IMPLEMENTATION HAS NOT STARTED
CI GREEN IS EVIDENCE, NOT ACCEPTANCE
NOT SELF-ADJUDICATED